Part 1.0 Governing Board

Section 1.0 Governing Board Membership

 

Policy Statement:

Number, Election, Tenure and Qualifications of A Governing Board Member.

A. The number of directors of the Corporation may be a maximum of five (5) voting members, but shall not be less than three (3).

B. Each director shall serve until their resignation, removal or earlier death.

C. Any director may be removed at any time upon majority vote of the Board of Directors.

D. Vacancies.  Any director may resign at any time by giving written notice to the Chair of the Board of Directors, or to the Secretary of the Corporation.  Such resignation shall take effect at the time specified therein, and unless otherwise specified therein, the acceptance of such resignation shall not be necessary to make it effective.

The Board of Directors may or may not elect to fill Board of Directors vacancies above the minimum number of three (3) directors.  If the Board of Directors elects  to fill Board of Director vacancies, they will solicit applications from persons willing to fill a Board of Directors vacancy.  The Board of Directors will set timelines for such solicitation and review of applications.  Upon consideration of applications, the Board of Directors may be filled by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors though that number of directors may constitute less than a quorum.  The Board of Directors shall elect a Chair and Vice-Chair from the board membership and may appoint a Secretary, however the Secretary need not be a voting member of the Board of Directors.

One director shall be a parent elected by the parent population of the school.  This shall be the case as long as it is required by Utah State statute.

Part 1.1 Governing Board

Section A-1.1 Number, Election, Tenure And Qualification Of A Governing Board Member

 

Policy Statement:

Number, Election, Tenure and Qualifications of A Governing Board Member.

A. The number of directors of the Corporation may be a maximum of five (5) voting members, but shall not be less than three (3).

B. Each director shall serve until their resignation, removal or earlier death.

C. Any director may be removed at any time upon majority vote of the Board of Directors.

D. Vacancies.  Any director may resign at any time by giving written notice to the Chair of the Board of Directors, or to the Secretary of the Corporation.  Such resignation shall take effect at the time specified therein, and unless otherwise specified therein, the acceptance of such resignation shall not be necessary to make it effective.

The Board of Directors may or may not elect to fill Board of Directors vacancies above the minimum number of three (3) directors.  If the Board of Directors elects  to fill Board of Director vacancies, they will solicit applications from persons willing to fill a Board of Directors vacancy.  The Board of Directors will set timelines for such solicitation and review of applications.  Upon consideration of applications, the Board of Directors may be filled by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors though that number of directors may constitute less than a quorum.  The Board of Directors shall elect a Chair and Vice-Chair from the board members and may appoint a Secretary, however, the Secretary need not be a voting member of the Board of Directors.

One director shall be a parent elected by the parent population of the school.  This shall be the case as long as it is required by Utah State statute.

Part 1.2 Governing Board

Section 1.2 Authority and Duties of Directors

Policy Statement:

The directors of the Corporation shall have the authority and shall exercise the powers and perform the duties specified below and as may be additionally specified by the Chair of the Board of Directors, the Board of Directors or these bylaws, except that in any event each officer shall exercise such powers and perform such duties as maybe required by law.

a. Chair of the Board of Directors.  The Chair of The Board of Directors is the Chief Administrative Officer and shall ( i ) preside, when present, at all meetings of the Board of Directors; ( ii ) see that all orders and resolutions of the Board of Directors are carried into effect; and ( iii) perform all other duties incident to the office of Chair of the Board of Directors and as from time to time may be assigned to the Chair of the Board of Directors.

b. Vice Chair. The Vice Chair of the Board of Directors shall ( i ) in the absence of the Char of the Board of Directors, preside at all meetings of the Board of Directors; ( ii ) perform all other duties incident to the office of Vice Chair as from time to time may be assigned to the Vice Chair by the Board of Directors.

Governing Board Policies

Part 1.3 Governance Policies

Governance Overview

 

Policy Statement:

From http://www.carvergovernance.com; Boards that Make A Difference, and Reinventing Your Board.

Policy Governance®, created by Dr. John Carver, is a model of governance designed to empower boards of directors to fulfill their obligation of accountability for the organizations they govern.  The model enables the board to focus on the larger issues, to delegate with clarity, to control management’s job without meddling, to rigorously evaluate the accomplishment of the organization, and to truly lead its organization.

In contrast to the approaches typically used by boards, Policy Governance separates issues of organizational purpose (ENDS) from all other organizational issues (MEANS), placing primary importance on Ends.  Policy Governance boards demand accomplishment of purpose, and only limit the staff’s available means to those which do not violate the board’s pre-stated standards of prudence and ethics.  It is based on 10 principles.

There is trust in the trusteeship.  The Board is a corporate entity entrusted with the authority to govern and lead American Preparatory Academy on behalf of its owners – parents, students, and the State of Utah.  This includes keeping in contact with them, and listening to their voices.

The Board speaks with one voice or not at all.  Differences among members are respected and encouraged during discussion, but the Board’s group decisions and formal actions are clear, recorded in policy, and upheld by every member of the board as if it had been his/her own decision.  No one person or sub-group makes policy for the Board.

 

Board decisions are predominantly policy decisionsbecause policy expresses vision, commitments values, and wisdom in clear statements of importance.  Policies are readily transmittable to all and impact every aspect of American Preparatory Academy’s work in an efficient manner.

 

The Board formulates policy over large issues with broad policies, and subsequently progresses to more narrow ones.  This is essential to making policy without loopholes.  Thus the Board comes to a point at which it is happy to entrust any further interpretation of its policies to the School Director.  The level at which the Board stops speaking is the level at which the School Director takes over, free to do anything that is consistent with “a reasonable interpretation” of the Board’s policies.

 

Board Policies fit into four categories:

 

ENDS—ENDS are policies that focus on outcomes and what American Prep intends to achieve.  ENDS are the pivotal duty of governance.  The Board, on behalf of the ownership defines which human needs are to be met, for whom, and at what cost.  Written with a long-term perspective, these mission-related policies embody the Board’s vision, and American Preparatory Academy’s reason for being.The Board leaves it up to the School Director to decide on the MEANS by which to achieve these ends, and evaluates the School Director’s performance based on how well the results of American Preparatory Academy’s actions match the desired ENDS.

EXECUTIVE LIMITATIONS– Executive Limitations are policies that focus on MEANS. MEANS are American Preparatory Academy’s activities, methods, and practices needed to accomplish the ends are its MEANS.  The Board creates policy that sets limits on the MEANS with which the School Director operates. These limits are principles of prudence and ethics that form a boundary specifying in writing which staff means would be unacceptable or off limits.

 

The Board defines and delegates rather than reacts and ratifies.  Board policies that define ENDS and delegate MEANS provide all the criteria by which approval is given and assures that the execution of plans is within the limits of the Board policies.  Implementing this principle promotes staff creativity and flexibility and prevents the Board from becoming weighted down with detail.

 

The Board best controls staff MEANS by limiting, not prescribing.  In Executive Limitations policies, the Board clearly states what it will not allow.  As it is impossible for boards to oversee all the detail involved in the day to day running of an organization, the Board is otherwise silent in directing administration actions.  This empowers the administration to use their full creative powers while at the same time safeguarding against potential abuses, enabling the Board to concentrate its energies on ENDS issues.

 

BOARD-MANAGEMENT LINKAGE—This governance function is most efficiently performed when the board holds just one person accountable – the School Director.  Board-Management policies define how the Board and School Director work together, and how the School Director is evaluated by the Board.  In essence, the School Director is the Board’s sole employee.  The School Director is empowered to do the job but the Board ensures that the organization is safe.  The Board achieves this by stating “Here is what we want you to achieve (Ends); here is what we want you to avoid (Executive Limitations)”; and then leaving the School Director free to make all further decisions and policies within “any reasonable interpretation” of its words. Then the Board rigorously monitors all board policies to ensure their fulfillment – but only against policy criteria.  Using policy criteria provides the basis for fair performance evaluation, that is, performance evaluation based on known expectations.  The Board’s Ends and Executive Limitations policies are the only expectations for the purpose of the School Director’s evaluation and the Board’s Governance Process and Board-Management Relationship policies are the only expectations for the purpose of Board evaluation.

 

As a result, the Board forges a linkage with Administration that is empowering and safe.  Clear differentiation in their roles and responsibilities enables all to mutually support each other and influence each other toward greater integrity and capability for leadership.  The Board expects results, honesty, and straightforwardness.  The Board is understanding about performance, but never bends an inch on integrity.  In turn, the School Director expects the Board to be clear about the rules and then play by them, to fulfill its own job, and to speak with one voice.

 

GOVERNANCE PROCESS—The Board sets policies for its own job, specifically its philosophy, its accountability, the role of officers, and its own discipline process.  An effective board ensures that it fulfills its three primary responsibilities on behalf of the ownership and ensures that Ends are achieved in a legal, ethical, and prudent manner:

  1. Maintain links to the ownership, that is, parents, students, and the State of Utah.
  2. Establishes the four categories of written policies as defined by the Policy Governance approach, so that everything the Board has to say is included in their encompassing framework.
  3. Assures School Director performance.

Except for what belongs in bylaws and federal or state statutes, these categories of board policy are exhaustive.  They contain everything the Board has to say about the values and perspectives that underlie all organizational decisions, activities, practices, budgets, and goals.  The Board, and only the Board, assumes full responsibility in these areas.  By setting clear board process policies, the Board develops a consistent plan for how it will operate compelling it to remain focused on the critical challenges of providing vision and leadership.

 

Part 1.3.1 Governing Board

Section 1.3.1 Governance Policies

Paragraph 1.3.1 Ends Policies

Policy Statement:

Ends Policies

E 1.  Global Ends Policy

E 2A.   Ends: Student Achievement

Character

Academic

Social Skills

Critically Minded

Community Service

E 2B.   Ends: Premier Charter School Model

E 2C.   Ends: Valuable Resource

Other Schools

Education Community

E#1:    The purpose of UCA is a high-quality, successful, and comprehensive educational model for a cost per school comparable to other Utah schools.  In pursuit of these ends, UCA will bring about results in the following areas:

  • UCA students achieve exemplary character, academic, and social skills; are critically minded; and active in community service.
  • UCA will become the premier charter school model in Utah which includes a superb parent-school partnership.
  • UCA is a valuable resource for other schools and the education community at large and affects positive change in education in Utah.

Adopted:  10/15/09

Monitoring method:  Internal Report

Monitoring frequency:  Annually by July 31s

Part 1.3.2  Governing Board

Section 1.3.2  Governance Policies

Paragraph 1.3.2  Executive Limitations

Policy Statement:

Executive Limitations Policy

EL 1. Global Executive Limitations Policy

EL 2A. Treatment of Consumers

EL 2B. Treatment of Staff

EL 2C. Financial Planning and Budgeting

EL 2D. Financial Condition and Activities

EL 2E. Emergency Principal Succession

EL 2F. Asset Protection

EL 2G. Compensation and Benefits

EL 2H. Communication and Support to the Board

EL 2I. Ends Focus of Grants or Contracts

 

 

EL#1:             The School Director shall not cause or allow any organizational practice, activity, decision, or circumstance that is either unlawful, imprudent, or in violation of commonly accepted business and professional ethics and practices.

Adopted: 10/18/07

Monitoring method:  Internal Report

Monitoring frequency:  Annually by July 31st

EL #2A:  Treatment of Consumers

With respect to interactions with parents, students, community members and officials, the School Director shall not cause or allow conditions, procedures, or decisions that are illegal, unsafe, untimely, undignified, or unnecessarily intrusive.

Adopted: 11/21/07

Monitoring method:  Internal Report

Monitoring frequency:  Annually by July 31st

 

EL#3A:  The School Director shall not

  1. Elicit information for which there is no clear necessity.
  2. Use methods of collecting, reviewing, transmitting or storing consumer information that fail to protect against improper access to the material
  3. Fail to operate facilities with appropriate accessibility and privacy.
  4. Fail to provide consumers with a parent/student handbook that includes a grievance process for persons who believe they have not been accorded reasonable protections under this policy.
  5. Fail to follow policies outlined in parent/student handbook.
  6. Fail to inform consumers of this policy.

Adopted: 11/4/09

Monitoring method:  Internal Report

Monitoring frequency:  Annually by July 31st

EL#2B:  Treatment of Staff

With respect to the treatment of paid and volunteer staff, the School Director may not cause or allow conditions that are illegal, unfair, undignified, disorganized, unsafe, or unclear.

Adopted: 11/21/07

Monitoring method:  Internal Report

Monitoring frequency:  Annually by July 31st

 

EL#3B:  The School Director shall not

  1. Operate without written personnel rules that (a) clarify rules for staff, (b) provide for effective handling of grievances, and (c) protect against wrongful conditions such as nepotism and grossly preferential treatment for personal reasons.
  2. Discriminate or retaliate against any staff member for expressing a dissent.
  3. Prevent staff from grieving to the board when (a) internal procedures have been exhausted, and (b) the employee alleges either that (i) board policy has been violated to his or her detriment or (ii) board policy does not adequately protect his or her human rights.
  4. Fail to acquaint staff with the School Director’s interpretation of their protections under this policy.
  5. Allow staff to be unprepared to deal with emergency situations.
  6. Use methods of collecting, reviewing, transmitting or storing consumer information that fail to protect against improper access to the material
  7. Fail to compensate staff competitively.

Adopted: 11/04/09

Monitoring method:  Internal Report

Monitoring frequency:  Annually by July 31st

EL#2C:  Financial Planning/Budgeting

The School Director shall not cause or allow financial planning for any fiscal year or the remaining part of any fiscal year to deviate materially from the board’s Ends priorities, risk financial jeopardy, or fail to meet the long term goals of the school.

Adopted: 11/21/07

Monitoring method:

Monitoring frequency:  Annually by July 31st

 

EL#3C:  There will be no financial plans that

  1. Risk incurring those situations or conditions described as unacceptable in the board policy “Financial Condition and Activities.”
  2. Contain too little information or omit credible projection of revenues and expenses; cause the unnecessary separation of capital and operational items negatively impacting cash flow and subsequent audit trails; and prevent the disclosure of planning assumptions
  3. Provide less for board prerogatives during the year than is set forth in the “Cost of Governance” policy (GP#2H).

Adopted: 11/04/09

Revised:  12/17/09

Monitoring method:  Internal Report

Monitoring frequency:  Annually by July 31st

EL#2D:  Financial Condition and Activities

With respect to the actual, ongoing financial conditions and activities, the School Director shall not cause or allow the development of financial jeopardy or material deviation of actual expenditures from board priorities established in Ends policies.

Adopted: 11/21/07

Monitoring method:  External Report

Monitoring frequency:  Annually by December 31st

 

EL#3D:   The School Director shall not

  1. Expend more funds than have been received in the fiscal year without board approval.
  2. Incur debt in a manner inconsistent with APA’s School Finance Policies. (see Appendix A)
  3. Shall not violate board approved reserves policy.
  4. Fail to settle payroll and debts in a timely manner.
  5. Allow tax payments or other government-ordered payments or filings to be overdue or inaccurately filed.
  6. Make a single purchase, split order, or commitment of greater than $10,000.00 without board approval except as authorized in APA’s School Financial policies, by agreement, or by board authorization.
  7. Use restricted contribution for any purpose other than that required by the contribution.

Adopted: 12/17/09

Monitoring method:  External Report

Monitoring frequency:  Annually by December 31st

EL#2E:  Emergency School Director Succession

To protect the board from sudden loss of School Director services, the School Director shall not permit there to be fewer than one other executive sufficiently familiar with Board and School Director issues and processes to enable him/her to take over with reasonable proficiency as an interim successor.

Adopted: 11/21/07

Monitoring method:  Internal Report

Monitoring frequency:  Annually by July 31st

EL#2F:  Asset Protection

The School Director shall not cause or knowingly allow corporate assets to be unprotected, inadequately maintained, or unnecessarily risked.

Adopted: 11/21/07

Monitoring method:  External Report

Monitoring frequency:  Annually by December 31st

 

EL#3F:  The School Director shall not

  1. Fail to insure against theft and casualty losses to at least 80% of replacement value and against liability losses to board members, staff, and the organization itself in an amount great than the average for comparable organizations.
  2. Allow unbonded personnel access to material amounts of funds.
  3. Subject facilities and equipment to improper wear and tear or insufficient maintenance.
  4. Unnecessarily expose the organization, its board, or its staff to claims of liability.
  5. Make any purchase (a) wherein normally prudent protection has not been given against conflict of interest; (b) of more than $5000.00 without having obtained comparative prices and quality; or (c) of more than $5000.00 without a stringent method of assuring the balance of long-term quality and cost.  Orders shall not be split to avoid these criteria.
  6. Allow any check over $3000.00(with the exception of regular, monthly bills for health insurance, employee retirement, and rent) to be released without 2 signatures.
  7. Fail to protect intellectual property, information, and files from loss or significant damage.
  8. Receive, process, or disburse funds under controls insufficient to meet the board-appointed auditor’s standards.
  9. Compromise the independence of the board’s audit or other external monitoring or advice, such as by engaging parties already chosen by the board as consultants or advisers.
  10. Invest or hold operating capital in insecure instruments, including uninsured checking accounts and bonds of less than AA rating at any time, or in non-interest-bearing accounts except when necessary to facilitate ease in operational transactions.
  11. Endanger the organization’s public image, its credibility, or its ability to accomplish Ends.
  12. Change the organization’s name or substantially alter its identity in the community
  13. Create or purchase any subsidiary corporation.

Adopted: 12/17/09

Monitoring method:  External Report

Monitoring frequency:  Annually by December 31st

EL#2G:  Compensation and Benefits

With respect to employment, compensation, and benefits to employees, consultants, contract workers, and volunteers, the School Director shall not cause or knowingly allow jeopardy to financial integrity or to public image.

Adopted:  10/15/09

Monitoring method:  Internal Report

Monitoring frequency:  Annually by July 31st

 

 

EL#3G:  The School Director shall not

  1. Change his or her own compensation and benefits, except as those benefits are consistent with a package for all other employees.
  2. Promise or imply permanent or guaranteed employment.
  3. Establish current compensation and benefits that deviate materially from the      geographic or professional market for the skills employed.
    1. Create compensation or benefit obligations over a longer term than revenues can be safely projected, in no event longer than one year and in all events subject to losses in revenue.
    2. Establish or change pension benefits so as to cause unpredictable or inequitable situations, including those that
      1. Incur unfunded liabilities
      2. Provide less than some basic level of benefits to all fulltime employees, though differential benefits to encourage longevity are not prohibited
      3. Allow any employee to lose benefits already accrued from any foregoing plan.
      4. Treat the SCHOOL DIRECTOR differently from other key employees.

Adopted:  1/28/10

Monitoring method:  Internal Report

Monitoring frequency:  Annually by July 31st

EL#2H:  Communication and Support to the Board

The School Director shall not cause or knowingly allow the board to be uninformed or unsupported in its work.

Adopted:  10/15/09

Monitoring method:  Internal Report

Monitoring frequency:  Annually by July 31st

 

EL#3H:  The School Director shall not

  1. Neglect to submit monitoring data required by the board policy (see Monitoring SCHOOL DIRECTOR Performance BML#3D) in a timely, accurate, and understandable fashion, directly addressing provision of board policies being monitored.
  2. Fail to marshal for the board as many staff and external points of view, issues, and options as needed for fully informed board choices and policy creation.
  3. Fail to advise the Board in a timely manner of trends, facts, and/or information relevant to the Board’s work or upon which board policy has been or will be established.
  4. Let the board be unaware of any information it requires including but not limited to anticipated media coverage, threatened or pending lawsuits, material internal and external changes, academic performance, enrollment, human resources, or any other trend that has global organization impact.
  5. Present information in unnecessarily complex or lengthy form or in a form that is unrelated to board policy or work.
  6. Fail to report in a timely manner, any actual or anticipated noncompliance with any policy of the board regardless of the board’s monitoring schedule.
  7. Fail to advise the board of, in the SCHOOL DIRECTOR’s opinion, the board is not in compliance with its own policies on Governance Process and Board-Management Delegation, particularly in the case of board behavior that is detrimental to the work relationship between the board and the SCHOOL DIRECTOR.
  8. Fail to provide a workable mechanism for official board, officer, or committee communications.
  9. Fail to deal with the board as a whole except when fulfilling individual requests for information or responding to officers or committees duly charged by the board.
  10. Fail to supply for the Board’s agenda all items delegated to the SCHOOL DIRECTOR yet required by law, regulation, or contract to be board-approved, along with applicable the monitoring assurance pertaining thereto.

Adopted: 1/28/10

Monitoring method:  Internal Report

Monitoring frequency:  Annually by July 31st

EL#2I:  Ends Focus of Grants or Contracts

The School Director may not enter into any grant or contract arrangements on behalf of the school that fail to emphasize primarily the production of Ends and secondarily, the avoidance of unacceptable means.

Adopted:  10/15/09

Monitoring method:  Internal Report

Monitoring frequency:  Annually by July 31st

 

EL#3I:  The School Director shall not

  1. Fail to prohibit particular methods and activities to preclude grant funds from being used in imprudent, unlawful, or unethical ways.
  2. Fail to assess and consider an applicant’s capability to produce appropriately targeted, efficient results.
  3. Fund specific methods except when doing so for research purposes, when the result to be achieved is knowledge about differential effectiveness of various methods.

Adopted: 1/28/10

Monitoring method:  Internal Report

Monitoring frequency:  Annually by July 31st

Part 1.3.2  Governing Board

Section 1.3.2  Governance Policies

Paragraph 1.3.2  Board-Management Linkage

Policy Statement:

Board-Management Linkage

BML 1. Global Board-Management Linkage Policy

BML 2A. Unity of Control

BML 2B. Accountability of the School Director

BML 2C. Delegation to the School Director

BML 2D. Monitoring School Director Performance

Board-Management Linkage Policies

BML#1:   The board’s sole official connection to the operational organization, its achievements, and conduct will be through the School Director.

Adopted: 10/18/07

Monitoring method:  Self-Monitoring see GP#3A-4

Monitoring frequency:  Annually in  (insert month)_

BML#2A:  Unity of Control

Only officially passed motions of the board are binding on the School Director.

Adopted: 03/27/08

Monitoring method:  Self-Monitoring see GP#3A-4

Monitoring frequency:  Annually in  (insert month)_

 

BML#3A: Accordingly

  1. Decisions or instructions of individual board members are not binding on the School Director except in rare instances when the board has specifically authorized such exercise of authority.
  2. In the case of board members or committees requesting information or    assistance without board authorization, the School Director can refuse such requests that require, in the School Director’s opinion, a material amount of staff time or funds, or are disruptive.

Adopted: 2/25/10

Monitoring method:  Self-Monitoring see GP#3A-4

Monitoring frequency:  Annually in  (insert month)_

BML#2B:  Accountability of the School Director

The School Director is the board’s only link to operational achievement and conduct, so that all authority and accountability of staff, as far as the board is concerned, is considered the authority and accountability of the School Director.

Adopted: 03/27/08

Monitoring method:  Self-Monitoring see GP#3A-4

Monitoring frequency:  Annually in  (insert month)_

 

BML#3B:  Accordingly

  1. The board will never give instructions to persons who report directly or indirectly to the School Director.
  2. The board will refrain from evaluating, either formally or informally, any staff other than the School Director.
  3. The board will view School Director performance as identical to organizational performance so that organizational accomplishment of board-stated Ends and avoidance of board-proscribed means will be viewed as successful School Director performance.

Adopted: 2/25/10

Monitoring method:  Self-Monitoring see GP#3A-4

Monitoring frequency:  Annually in  (insert month)_

BML#2C:  Delegation to the School Director

The board will instruct the School Director through written policies that prescribe the organizational Ends to be achieved, and proscribe organizational situations and actions to be avoided, allowing the School Director to use any reasonable interpretation of these policies.

Adopted: 03/27/08

Monitoring method:  Self-Monitoring see GP#3A-4

Monitoring frequency:  Annually in  (insert month)_

BML#3C: Accordingly

1.  The Board will develop policies instructing the School Director to achieve defined end results for identified students, or subgroups of students, with a designated priority of time and resources. These policies will be developed systematically from the broadest, most general level to more defined levels, and will be called Ends policies.

2.  The Board will develop policies which limit the latitude the School Director may exercise in choosing the organizational means to achieve the Ends.  These policies will be developed systematically from the broadest, most general level to more defined levels, and they will be called Executive Limitation policies.

3.  As long as the School Director uses any reasonable interpretation of the board’s Ends and Executive Limitations policies, the School Director is authorized to establish all further policies, make all decision, take all actions, establish all practices, and pursue all activities.  But the Board will make the final determination of whether the School Director is in compliance with Board policies.

4.   The board may change its Ends and Executive Limitations policies, thereby shifting the boundary between board and School Board domains.  By doing so, the board changes the latitude of choice given to the School Director.  But as long as any particular delegation is in place, the board will respect and support the School Director’s choices.

Adopted: 2/25/10

Monitoring method:  Self-Monitoring see GP#3A-4

Monitoring frequency:  Annually in  (insert month)_

BML#2D:  Monitoring School Director Performance

Systematic and rigorous monitoring of the School Director job performance will be solely against the only expected School Director job outputs: organizational accomplishment of board policies on Ends and organizational operation within the boundaries established in board policies on Executive Limitations.

Adopted: 03/27/08

Monitoring method:  Self-Monitoring see GP#3A-4

Monitoring frequency:  Annually in  (insert month)_

 

BML#3D:  Accordingly:

1.   Monitoring determines the degree to which Board policies are being met.  Information not formally presented as monitoring data and that does not contribute directly to this purpose is not considered monitoring data.

2.  The Board will acquire monitoring data on policies by one or more of three methods:

  • by internal report, in which the School Director discloses information and certifies compliance to the board;
  • by external report, in which an external, disinterested third party selected by the Board assesses compliance with board policies; and/or
  • by direct board inspection, in which a designated member or members of the board assess compliance with the appropriate policy criteria.

3.  In every case, the standard for compliance of Executive Limitations policies shall be any reasonable interpretation by the School Director.  The standard for compliance of the Ends policies shall be whether reasonable progress is being made toward achieving the Board’s prescribed Ends.  The Board will make the final determination as to whether School Director’s interpretation is reasonable and whether reasonable progress is being made.

4.  All policies that instruct the School Director will be monitored at a frequency and by a method chosen by the board.  The Board may monitor any policy at any time by any method, but will ordinarily depend on a routine schedule.

Policy

Method(s)

Frequency

Month

Global EndsInternal ReportAnnuallyby July 31st

E 2A.  Student Achievement

Character

Academic

Social Skills

Critically Minded

Community Service

Internal ReportAnnuallyby July 31st
E 2B.  Premier Charter School ModelInternal ReportAnnuallyby July 31st
E 2C.  Valuable Resource to other schools and education communityInternal ReportAnnuallyby July 31st
EL 1.  Global Executive LimitationInternal ReportAnnuallyby July 31st
EL 2A, 3A.  Treatment of ConsumersInternal ReportAnnuallyby July 31st
EL 2B, 3B.  Treatment of StaffInternal ReportAnnuallyby July 31st
EL 2C, 3C.  Financial Planning and BudgetingInternal ReportAnnuallyby July 31st
EL 2D, 3D.  Financial Conditions and ActivitiesExternal AuditAnnuallyby Dec 31st
EL 2E.  Emergency School Director SuccessionInternal ReportAnnuallyby July 31st
EL 2F, 3F.  Asset ProtectionExternal AuditAnnuallyby Dec 31st
 EL 2G, 3G.  Compensation and BenefitsInternal ReportAnnuallyby July 31st
EL 2H, 3H.  Communication and Support to the BoardInternal ReportAnnuallyby July 31st
EL 2I, 3I.  Ends Focus of Grants or ContractsInternal ReportAnnuallyby July 31st

5.  In conjunction with monitoring the School Director’s job performance, the Board will conduct an annual formal summative evaluation of the School Director.  The evaluation will be based upon data collected during the year from the monitoring of Board policies on Ends and Executive Limitations.  A written evaluation document will be prepared by the Board.  The School Director and the Board will review the document in executive session.

The document will consist of:

  • A summary of the data derived during the year from monitoring the Board’s policies on Ends and Executive Limitations;
  • Conclusions relative to whether each End has been achieved or whether reasonable progress has been made toward its achievement; and when necessary, an improvement plan addressing any insufficient progress toward meeting the goals;
  • Conclusions relative to whether the School Director has reasonably interpreted and operated properly within the boundaries established by the board policies; and when necessary, an improvement plan addressing any deficiencies in operation within the boundaries of the Board policies;
  • A summary of the School Director’s strengths and weaknesses relative to achievement of the Ends policies and operation within the boundaries established in the Executive Limitation policies.  Nothing in this policy is intended to imply the establishment of any personal rights not explicitly established by statute, contract, or Board policy.  All employment decisions related to the School Director, including contract agreements, remain the sole discretion of the Board.

Adopted: 8/26/10

Monitoring method:  Self-Monitoring see GP#3A-4

Monitoring frequency:  Annually in  (insert month)_

BML#2E Board/School Director Covenants

In order to build and maintain productive and effective relationships between the Board and the School Director, both the Board and the School Director will maintain a system of communication and interaction that builds upon mutual respect and trust.

Adopted: 8/26/10

Monitoring method:  Self-Monitoring see GP#3A-4

Monitoring frequency:  Annually in  (insert month)_

BML#3E:  Accordingly, the Board and the School Director will

1.   Exercise honesty in all written and interpersonal interaction, avoiding misleading information.

2.   Demonstrate respect for the opinions and comments of each other.

3.   Focus on issues rather than on personalities.

4.   Maintain focus on common goals.

5.   Communicate with each other in a timely manner to avoid surprises.

6.   Criticize privately, praise publicly.

7.   Maintain appropriate confidentiality.

8.   Openly share personal concerns, information, knowledge, and agendas.

9.   Make every reasonable effort to protect the integrity and promote the positive image of the school(s) and each other.

10. Respond in a timely manner to requests and inquiries from each other.

 

Adopted:  8/26/10

Monitoring method:  Self-Monitoring see GP#3A-4

Monitoring frequency:  Annually in  (insert month)_

Part 1.3.2  Governing Board

Section 1.3.2  Governance Policies

Paragraph 1.3.2  Governance Process

Policy Statement:

Governance Process

GP#1:  The purpose of the board, on behalf of the citizens of the State of Utah, is to see that the school:

  • Achieves appropriate results for appropriate persons for an appropriate cost (as specified in Board Ends Policies).
  • Avoids unacceptable actions and situations (as prohibited in Board Executive Limitations policies).

Adopted: 10/18/07

Monitoring method:  Self-Monitoring see GP#3A-4

Monitoring frequency:  Annually in  (insert month)_

GP#2A:  Governing Style

The board will govern lawfully, observing the principles of the Policy Governance model, with an emphasis on: (a) Outward vision rather than internal preoccupation, (b) Encouragement of diversity in viewpoints, (c) Strategic leadership more than administrative detail, (d) Clear distinction of board and chief executive roles, (e) Collective rather than individual decisions, (f) Future rather than past or present, and (g) Proactivity rather than reactivity.

Adopted: 02/28/08

Monitoring method:  Self-Monitoring see GP#3A-4

Monitoring frequency:  Annually in  (insert month)_

 

GP#3A:  Accordingly,

1.  The board will cultivate a sense of group responsibility.  The board, not the staff will be responsible for excellence in governing.  The board will be the initiator of policy, not merely a reactor to staff initiatives.  The board will use the expertise of individual members to enhance the ability of the board as a body rather than to substitute individual judgments for the board’s values.  The board will allow no officer, individual, or committee of the board to hinder or be an excuse for not fulfilling board commitments.

2.   The board will direct, control and inspire the organization through the careful establishment of written policies reflecting the board’s values and perspectives about ends to be achieved and means to be avoided.  The board’s major policy focus will be on the intended long-term effects, not on the administrative or programmatic means of attaining those effects.

3.  The board will enforce upon itself whatever discipline is needed to govern with excellence.  Discipline will apply to matters such as preparation for meetings, attendance, attentiveness and participation in meetings; policy-making principles, respect of roles, and ensuring the continuance of governance capability.  Continual board development will include training new members of the board in the board’s governance process and periodic board discussion and evaluation of process improvement.

4.  The board will monitor and discuss the board’s process and performance at each meeting.  Self-monitoring will include comparison of board activity and discipline to policies in the Governance Process and Board-Management Linkage categories.

Adopted: 9/16/10

Monitoring method:  Self-Monitoring see GP#3A-4

Monitoring frequency:  Annually in  (insert month)_

GP#2B:  Board Job Description

As an informed agent of the citizens of the state of Utah, specific job outputs of the board as an informed agent of the ownership are those that ensure appropriate organizational performance.

Adopted: 02/28/08

Monitoring method:  Self-Monitoring see GP#3A-4

Monitoring frequency:  Annually in  (insert month)_

 

GP#3B:  Accordingly the board will provide

1.   Authoritative linkage between the ownership and the operational organization.

2.   Written governing policies that, at the broadest levels, address the each category of organizational decisions and situations:

  1. Ends: Organizational impacts, benefits, outcomes, and end results for specified recipients and their relative worth (what good for which recipients at what cost);
  2. Executive Limitations: Constraints on executive authority that establish the practical, ethical, and legal boundaries within which all activity and decisions must take place
  3. Governance Process: Specification of how the board conceives, carries out and monitors its own work;
  4. Board/Management Linkage: How authority is delegated and its proper use monitored; the School Director’s role, authority, and accountability.

3.  Assurance of the School Director’s performance through monitoring Ends and Executive Limitations policies. (See BML#3D for schedule).

Adopted: 9/16/10

Monitoring method:  Self-Monitoring see GP#3A-4

Monitoring frequency:  Annually in  (insert month)_

GP#4B:   To accomplish its job products with governance style consistent with board policies, the board will follow an annual agenda that (a) completes a re-exploration of Ends policies annually and (b) continually improves board performance through board education and enriched input and deliberation.

Adopted: 9/16/10

Monitoring method:  Self-Monitoring see GP#3A-4

Monitoring frequency:  Annually in  (insert month)_

 

GP#5B:

1.   The cycle will conclude each year on the last day of June so that administrative planning and budgeting can be based on accomplishing a one-year segment of the board’s most recent statement of long-term Ends.

2.   The cycle will start with the Board’s development of its annual agenda/planning calendar for the next year:

  • Consultations with selected groups in the ownership or other methods of gaining ownership input will be determined and arranged to be held during the balance of the year.
  • Governance education and education related to ends determination (e.g. presentations by futurists, demographers, advocacy groups, staff, etc.) will be arranged to be held during the balance of the year.

3.   Throughout the year, the board will attend to consent agenda items as expeditiously as possible.

4.   School Director monitoring will be included on the agenda if monitoring            reports show policy violations or if policy criteria are to be debated.

5.   School Director remuneration will be decided after a review of monitoring reports received in July.

Adopted: 9/16/10

Monitoring method:  Self-Monitoring see GP#3A-4

Monitoring frequency:  Annually in  (insert month)_

GP#2C:  Board Chairperson’s Role

The Board Chairperson, a specially empowered member of the board, assures the integrity of the board’s process and, secondarily, occasionally represents the board to outside parties.

Adopted: 02/28/08

Monitoring method:  Self-Monitoring see GP#3A-4

Monitoring frequency:  Annually in  (insert month)_

 

GP#3C:  Accordingly,

1.   The job result of the chairperson is that the board behaves consistently with its own rules and those legitimately imposed upon it from outside the organization.

  • Meeting discussion content will be only issues that, according to board policy, clearly belong to the board to decide, not the School Director.
    • Deliberation will be fair, open, and through but also timely, orderly, and to the point.

2.  The authority of the chairperson consists in making decisions that fall within topics covered by board policies on Governance Process and Board-Management Linkage, except where the board specifically delegates portions of this authority to others.  The chairperson is authorized to use any reasonable interpretation of the provisions in these policies.

  • The chairperson is empowered to chair board meetings with all the commonly accepted power of that position (for example, ruling, recognizing).
  • The chairperson has no authority to make decisions about policies created by the board within Ends and Executive Limitations policy areas.  Therefore, the chairperson has no authority to supervise or direct the School Director.
  • The chairperson may represent the board to outside parties in announcing board-stated positions and in stating chair decisions and interpretations within the area delegated to her or him.
  • The chairperson may delegate this authority but remains accountable for its use.

Adopted: 10/21/10

Monitoring method:  Self-Monitoring see GP#3A-4

Monitoring frequency:  Annually in  (insert month)_

 

GP#2D:  Board Secretary’s Role – NOT adopted

The board secretary is an officer of the board whose purpose is to ensure the integrity of the board’s documents.

Adopted:

Monitoring method:  Self-Monitoring see GP#3A-4

Monitoring frequency:  Annually in  (insert month)_

GP#2E:  Board Members’ Code of Conduct

The board commits itself and its members to ethical, businesslike, and lawful conduct, including proper use of authority and appropriate decorum when acting as board members.

Adopted: 02/28/08

Monitoring method:  Self-Monitoring see GP#3A-4

Monitoring frequency:  Annually in  (insert month)_

GP#3E:

1.  Board members must represent unconflicted loyalty to the interests of the ownership.  This accountability supersedes any conflicting loyalty such as that to advocacy or interest groups and membership on other boards or staffs.  It also supersedes the personal interest of any board member acting as a consumer of the organization’s services

2.   Members must avoid conflict of interest with respect to their fiduciary responsibility.

  • There will be no self dealing or any conduct of private business or personal services between any board member and the organization, except as procedurally controlled, to assure openness, competitive opportunity, and equal access to inside information.
  • When the board is to decide upon an issue about which a member has an unavoidable conflict of interest, that member shall withdraw without comment not only from the vote but also from the deliberation.
  • Board members must not use their positions to obtain employment for themselves, family members, or close associates.  Should a member desire employment he or she must first resign.
  • Members will annually disclose their involvements with other organizations, with vendors, or any other that might produce a conflict of interest.

3.  Board members may not attempt to exercise individual authority over the organization except as explicitly set forth in board policies.

  • Members’ interaction with the public, the press, or other entities must recognize the same limitation and the inability of any board member to speak for the board except to repeat stated board decisions.
  • Members will give no consequence or voice to individual judgments of School Director or staff performance.
  • Members will respect the confidentiality appropriate to issues of a sensitive nature or that otherwise may tend to compromise the integrity or legal standing of the board.

5.  Members will be properly prepared for board deliberation.

6.  Members will support the legitimacy and authority of the final determination of the board on any matter, without regard to the member’s personal position on the issue.

Adopted: 10/21/10

Monitoring method:  Self-Monitoring see GP#3A-4

Monitoring frequency:  Annually in  (insert month)_

GP#2F:  Board Committee Principles 

Board committees, when used, will be assigned so as to reinforce the wholeness of the board’s job and so as never to interfere with delegation from board to School Director.

Adopted: 02/28/08

Monitoring method:  Self-Monitoring see GP#3A-4

Monitoring frequency:  Annually in  (insert month)_

GP#3F:  Accordingly,

  1. Board committees are to help the board do its job, never to help or advise the staff. In keeping with the board’s broader focus, board committees will normally not have direct dealings with current staff operations.
  2. Board committees may not speak or act for the board except when formally given such authority for specific and time-limited proposes.  Expectations and authority will be carefully stated in order not to conflict with authority delegated to the School director.
  3. Board committees cannot exercise authority over staff.  The School Director works or the full board, and will therefore not be required to obtain the approval of a board committee before an executive action.
  4. Board committees are to avoid over-identification with organizational parts rather than the whole.  Therefore, a board committee that has helped the board create policy on some topic will not be used to monitor organizational performance on that same topic.
  5. Committees will be used sparingly and ordinarily in an ad hoc capacity.
  6. This policy applies only to committees that are formed by Board action, whether or not the committees include Board members.  It does not apply to committees formed under the authority of the CEO.

Adopted: 10/21/10

Monitoring method:  Self-Monitoring see GP#3A-4

Monitoring frequency:  Annually in  (insert month)_

GP#2G:  Cost of Governance

Because poor governance costs more than learning to govern well, the board will invest in its governance capacity.

Adopted: 02/28/08

Monitoring method:  Self-Monitoring see GP#3A-4

Monitoring frequency:  Annually in  (insert month)_

 

GP#3G:  Accordingly,

1.  Board skills, methods, and supports will be sufficient to ensure governing with excellence.

  • Training and retraining will be used liberally to orient new members and candidates for membership, as well as to maintain and increase existing members’ skills and understandings.
  • Outreach mechanisms will be used as needed to ensure the board’s ability to listen to owner viewpoints and values.

2.   Costs will be prudently incurred, though not at the expense of endangering the development and maintenance of superior capability.

3.   The board will establish its Cost of Governance budget for the next fiscal year during the month of June.

Adopted: 10/21/10

Monitoring method:  Self-Monitoring see GP#3A-4

Monitoring frequency:  Annually in  (insert month)_

Part 1.3.2  Governing Board

Section1.3.2  Governance Policies

Paragraph 1.3.2  Governance Appendices

 

Policy Statement:

 

Governance Appendices

APA School Finance Policies rev 11/09